hauntedshadow: (Default)
hauntedshadow ([personal profile] hauntedshadow) wrote in [community profile] idproquo2020-01-24 08:12 pm
Entry tags:

Nominations Clarifications #2

Thank you for your patience as tags are being approved.

Nominations close January 25, at no earlier than 10PM UTC.
 
Please don’t forget to add disambiguations to your relationships/characters. To prevent confusion over wandering tags, nothing without a disambiguation will be approved. I’m adding disambiguations to some, but it’s going slow as these nominations are not given priority due to formatting. 
 
There are no rejections, but it might seem so from your end. I had to edit some tags that were approved, and AO3 lets you do that by removing the original tag from the tagset. If your nomination was rejected and does not appear in the tagset, please let me know. If it was edited to be something you did not intend, let me know. For both cases, please link to your nomination and let me know which nomination to fix.
 
If there’s anything in the tagset that needs changing, like characters/relationships that have wandered, typos, trope categories to be added to/removed from a freeform, etc, let me know here.





Clarifications

Freeform Tags


1.

Genfic/no romance or sex --- how is this iddy?


2.
 
Freeform tags for a fandom need to be prefaced with the fandom name. Example: MCU: Staying under the ice for so long deserums Steve so he’s skinny again

Nonbinary My Unit | Byleth --- is this for Fire Emblem: Fuukasetsugetsu | Fire Emblem: Three Houses? Is “Fire Emblem Three Houses” ok?

(Anonymous) 2020-01-25 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Is it that you don't want a mention of any kind of romantic/sexual relationship? I think maybe they're missing your point.

I once asked for a gen fic, and it did involve a parent/child relationship (a platonic one) but I got one where said parent in scenario was in a pairing. I realize it was in part my bad for not specifying the parent in the situation should be single, but I was really squicked by the pairing and was not happy. So if you were trying to avoid any mention of romantic relationships, I understand why you'd want that tag and consider it your id.

That said, they'd probably say it should be a DNW and not a tag.